国产精品天干天干,亚洲毛片在线,日韩gay小鲜肉啪啪18禁,女同Gay自慰喷水

歡迎光臨散文網 會員登陸 & 注冊

CheckCIF-RFACG01

2020-05-22 07:01 作者:DJ_Tokyo  | 我要投稿

PROC-NAME: RFACG01 Type_3

PURPOSE: To check that _refine_ls_R_factor_gt is within expected limits.

PROCEDURE:

TEST

IF _refine_ls_R_factor_gt > 0.20 issue ALERT A

?? "Alert A The value of the R factor is > 0.20"

> 0.15 issue ALERT B

?? "Alert B The value of the R factor is > 0.15"

> 0.10 issue ALERT C

?? "Alert C The value of the R factor is > 0.10"

The value of _refine_ls_R_factor_gt is equivalent to the conventional R-factor and when calculated using a threshold of 2sigma(I) in _reflns_threshold_expression, values less than 0.07 are normally expected. Higher values should be accompanied by a suitable explanation in the _publ_section_exptl_refinement section. However, authors should first ensure that there are not overlooked problems associated with the data or the model. Elevated values for _refine_ls_R_factor_gt may be indicative of a need to recollect the data from a crystal of higher quality or to improve or correct the model. Consider the following:

(a) The absorption corrections are inadequate or inappropriate.

(b) The overall quality of the data may be poor due to the crystal quality.

(c) There is untreated twinning either in the form of unconsidered merohedral twinning or where overlap from the second twin domain in non-merohedral twins (which may have been ignored in the data collection) causes errors in the intensities of some reflections.

(d) The model is incorrect or incomplete in terms of incorrect element assignment, missing atoms or unmodelled or inadequately modelled disorder or solvent atoms.

IF _refine_ls_R_factor_obs has been used issue General ALERT

?? "_refine_ls_R_factor_obs is an old dataname which has been superceded by _refine_ls_R_factor_gt"

You are using an "old-fashioned", but still legal data name: _refine_ls_R_factor_obs. Please update the item to match the currently preferred name of _refine_ls_R_factor_gt. To ease this problem for the future, it is recommended that you upgrade or modify your CIF generating software accordingly.

IF neither _refine_ls_R_factor_gt or _refine_ls_R_factor_obs are present issue Gerneral ALERT

?? "Alert C Test not performed. _refine_ls_R_factor_gt is not present."

It is compulsory to report the conventional R-factor under the item _refine_ls_R_factor_gt. This data name is not present in your CIF or has not been assigned a value. Please insert the data item with an apropriate value.

(http://journals.iucr.org/services/cif/checking/RFACG_01.html)

例:RFACG01_ALERT_3_B The value of the R factor is > 0.10

?? ?????????R factor given? 0.129

警告原因:R因子不在預期范圍內。

解決策略:給出合理解釋即可。


CheckCIF-RFACG01的評論 (共 條)

分享到微博請遵守國家法律
筠连县| 乡城县| 拜城县| 达孜县| 鹤山市| 兰考县| 梁河县| 榆树市| 北安市| 图木舒克市| 安溪县| 怀安县| 南投市| 贵港市| 绥德县| 平远县| 五寨县| 法库县| 银川市| 慈利县| 海兴县| 凤台县| 龙岩市| 拜泉县| 滦南县| 庆云县| 东乌珠穆沁旗| 聊城市| 政和县| 慈溪市| 稷山县| 桓台县| 鄂托克旗| 南阳市| 广水市| 大石桥市| 恩施市| 海宁市| 安康市| 社旗县| 临汾市|