国产精品天干天干,亚洲毛片在线,日韩gay小鲜肉啪啪18禁,女同Gay自慰喷水

歡迎光臨散文網(wǎng) 會員登陸 & 注冊

CheckCIF-REFNR01

2020-05-22 07:00 作者:DJ_Tokyo  | 我要投稿

PROC-NAME: REFNR01 Type_3

PURPOSE: To check that the ratio of _refine_ls_number_reflns and _refine_ls_number_parameters is acceptable.

PROCEDURE:

CALCULATE

S = SIN [_diffrn_reflns_theta_max] / _diffrn_radiation_wavelength

RRRT = _refine_ls_number_reflns / _reflns_number_total

RRTP = _refine_ls_number_reflns / _refine_ls_number_parameters

TEST

IF S < 0.59 OR RRRT < 0.95

IF CENTROSYMMETRIC

RRTP < 10 issue ALERT C

?? "Alert C Ratio of reflections to parameters is < 10 for a centrosymmetric structure"

RRTP < 8 issue ALERT B

?? "Alert B Ratio of reflections to parameters is < 8 for a centrosymmetric structure"

RRTP < 6 issue ALERT A

?? "Alert A Ratio of reflections to parameters is < 6 for a centrosymmetric structure"

IF NON-CENTROSYMMETRIC

IF ZMAX > 18

RRTP < 10 issue ALERT C

?? "Alert C Ratio of reflections to parameters is < 10 for a non-centrosymmetric structure, where ZMAX > 18"

RRTP < 8 issue ALERT B

?? "Alert B Ratio of reflections to parameters is < 8 for a non-centrosymmetric structure, where ZMAX > 18"

RRTP < 6 issue ALERT A

?? "Alert A Ratio of reflections to parameters is < 6 for a non-centrosymmetric structure, where ZMAX > 18"

ELSE

RRTP < 8 issue ALERT C

?? "Alert C Ratio of reflections to parameters is < 8 for a non-centrosymmetric structure, where ZMAX < 18"

RRTP < 6 issue ALERT B

?? "Alert B Ratio of reflections to parameters is < 6 for a non-centrosymmetric structure, where ZMAX < 18"

RRTP < 4 issue ALERT A

?? "Alert A Ratio of reflections to parameters is < 4 for a non-centrosymmetric structure, where ZMAX < 18"

The ratio of reflections used in the refinement to refined parameters (the r/p ratio) is important for ensuring precise atomic and geometric parameters. Higher r/p ratios generally improve the precision.

It is expected that for centrosymmetric space groups, the r/p ratio should be at least 10:1. This also applies for non-centrosymmetric space groups when an element heavier than chlorine is present, because the heavy atom usually improves the diffracting power of the sample to an extent that makes it worthwhile to collect additional high angle data and thereby obtain higher r/p ratios.

For non-centrosymmetric space groups when only elements lighter than argon are present, it is expected that the r/p ratio should be at least 8:1.

If you are having difficulty obtaining a suitable r/p ratio, consider the following:

(a) Was theta(max) set high enough for the measurement? A theta(max) of 25 deg. for Mo radiation or 67 deg. for Cu radiation is the minimum requirement, but use higher theta(max) values if the crystal diffracts sufficiently.

(b) Consider using a low temperature measurement to improve the diffracting power and then collect to a higher theta(max).

(c) Check that the data are complete to your chosen theta(max) and that segments of the unique reflections are not missing. If data completeness is an issue leading to a low r/p ratio, you will receive a separate validation alert about that.

(d) Check that you are using all (or as many as feasible) of your reflection data in the refinement. If weak reflections are being omitted with a sigma threshold cutoff, such as the criterion defined under _reflns_threshold_expression (this may be particularly relevant for refinements based on F), then you should consider reducing the cutoff threshold as far as possible, or, preferably, use all reflections in the refinement.

(e) Reduce the number of refined parameters by, for example, not refining H-atoms, using restraints or constraints, or refining highly disordered or ill-behaved atoms isotropically.

Note that if you have measured data to at least sin(theta)/lambda of 0.6 (theta(max) = 25 deg. for Mo radiation; theta(max) = 67 deg. for Cu radiation) and you have used all available unique reflections in the refinement, the reflection/parameter test is not applied, because it is considered that you have measured an appropriate quantity of data and that you have made the best possible use of that data.

Also note that with light atom non-centrosymmetric structures where anomalous dispersion effects are insignificant, it is unwise to attempt to use unmerged Friedel-related reflections simply to boost the r/p ratio.

(http://journals.iucr.org/services/cif/checking/REFNR_01.html)

例:REFNR01_ALERT_3_C Ratio of reflections to parameters is < 8 for a

??????????? non-centrosymmetric structure, where ZMAX < 18

??????????? sine(theta)/lambda??????????? ??0.5556

??????????? Proportion of unique data used??? 1.0000

??????????? Ratio reflections to paraters?????? 6.3713

警告原因:衍射點/參數(shù)比不在預(yù)期范圍內(nèi)。

解決策略:給出合理解釋即可。


CheckCIF-REFNR01的評論 (共 條)

分享到微博請遵守國家法律
三原县| 宁海县| 阜新市| 贵南县| 德昌县| 文化| 仪陇县| 新河县| 青河县| 盈江县| 报价| 元谋县| 铜川市| 太保市| 南丹县| 合阳县| 阿勒泰市| 内乡县| 积石山| 平江县| 武隆县| 武鸣县| 东港市| 望奎县| 平利县| 延寿县| 乃东县| 乌鲁木齐市| 开原市| 米易县| 湖口县| 麟游县| 京山县| 邵武市| 项城市| 福州市| 滨州市| 富平县| 荥阳市| 冕宁县| 油尖旺区|