国产精品天干天干,亚洲毛片在线,日韩gay小鲜肉啪啪18禁,女同Gay自慰喷水

歡迎光臨散文網(wǎng) 會(huì)員登陸 & 注冊(cè)

Assessment with Instructions

2023-02-16 10:47 作者:小卷煎  | 我要投稿


Please review this document in its entirety prior to starting the initial stage of the interview/assessment process.

Coding options based on candidate skillset. Please update your recruiter as to what you completed it in.

1. Candidates need to wrap the assessment in Spring Boot if they are Web API resources
2. Candidates need to use ReactJS if they are UI resources
3. If Javascript, try and create using ReactJS. ?The end client will take in account the lack of experience but is looking to see if the resource can adapt to a new technology and follow best practices and standards.
4. Do not use Typescript


Top reasons applicants fail the initial stage of interview process/assessment.
1. Unit Tests-these are required and should be clear and easy to decipher.
2. Keep the implementation as simple as possible so it’s easy for someone new to read, understand, and easily navigate the packages.
3. Follow component-based software engineering principles when completing the assessment. Ensure the code is clean.
4. Copy and Pasting Code. Candidates who do this are highly likely to fail the assessment unless the code is modified and is good code. ?Candidates who just copy the code without ensuring the quality are highly likely to fail. The client has reviewed enough assessment over the years to quickly identify this.
5. When feasible, utilize the newest technology and features you are familiar with. Example: Javascript features like ES6 built in methods. ?Java version 8 or higher vs version 6.
6. Variable Naming Convention. Use appropriate names for the variables used. This increases readability for other developers
7. Avoid using unnecessary 3rd party libraries.

Feedback on prior resources who did not pass the test
1. There are a couple of issues. The controller only has one method, which exposes rewards for ALL customers instead of letting you retrieve one by id. (This is fine with our requirements; it's just my pet peeve.) There's a "Uil" class, which I assume is supposed to be "Util". I wish there were more tests. The "three months" is enforced only by the data returned by the DAO; in a real-world scenario, this solution would require old data to be purged from the database or reliance on a remote service that only returns three months' worth of data to start with.
2. I feel like he didn't think through the API design first.
It seems like he used a TreeMap to calculate the Monthly Rewards and then just kind of lazily leaked this out to the consumer without thinking about how they might use it.
It'd be more convenient, at least for rendering it in a UI, to have an array of objects with month and amount properties.
There's other things I could nit-pick like some poor names such as updateBeginDate and CommonUtil, fields are package-private instead of private, and a lack of unit tests (which he noted in the README though) (the 1 unit test doesn't assert on the points).

3. Feedback: There’s no gitignore, which is leading to extra things getting included (.iml file, build package, etc.) ?No tests. ?The only endpoint is POST /rest/points which takes a request body full of transactions (month + amount) and formats them into a map of total points by month. ?The $100 = 0 points bug is there, too.
4 There are a couple of really strange things the code is doing (like their bizarre way of determining whether a transaction is part of the current month) and a bug for $100. ?The tests don’t add clarity, either.



Things to evaluate and consider prior to taking the assessment if you choose to do so in React.

1. For react apps, please structure and organize the project properly with separate folders for components, CSS Styling etc. and store all the relevant components for the application in the Components folder and styles in the styles folder etc. not outside in the main app.
2. Do not put complex Javascript logic inside HTML tags unless its basic JS logic, if the logic is complex, it should be separated out into its own file or component if the component needs to be further split into child components.
3. DO NOT forget unit tests-These should be clear and easy to decipher.
4. If needed separate out the CSS files whenever possible to be more relevant to the component it applies to


Pluses
6. ? Try to use React hooks and custom hooks wherever possible to promote code re-use.


Assessment with Instructions的評(píng)論 (共 條)

分享到微博請(qǐng)遵守國家法律
德保县| 肥城市| 子长县| 大丰市| 施甸县| 巴南区| 禹城市| 和顺县| 驻马店市| 磐石市| 武强县| 杂多县| 衡水市| 米泉市| 兴宁市| 调兵山市| 黄骅市| 易门县| 尉氏县| 天津市| 西昌市| 九江县| 甘泉县| 油尖旺区| 微山县| 宜城市| 元江| 定南县| 永靖县| 伊春市| 长沙市| 紫云| 瑞昌市| 东阳市| 安岳县| 曲周县| 石城县| 西林县| 治多县| 南丹县| 洛宁县|