Company Innovation

A?In a shabby office in downtown Manhattan, a group of 30 AI (artificial intelligence) programmers from Umagic are attempting to mimic the brains of a famous sexologist, a celebrated dietitian, a popular fitness coach and a bunch of other specialists, Umagic Systems is an up-and-coming firm, which sets up websites that enable their clients to seek advice from the virtual versions of those figures. The users put in all the information regarding themselves and their objectives; then it’s Umagic’s job to give advice, that a star expert would give. Even though the neuroses of American consumers have always been a marketing focus, the future of Umagic is difficult to predict (who knows what it’ll be like in ten years? Asking a computer about your sex life might be either normal or crazy).However, companies such as Umagic are starting to intimidate major American firms, because these young companies regard the half-crazy ‘creative’ ideas as the portal to their triumph in the future.

B?Innovation has established itself as the catchword of American business management. Enterprises have realised that they are running out of things that can be outsourced or re-engineered (worryingly, by their competitors too). Winners of today’s American business tend to be companies with innovative powers such as Dell, Amazon and Wal-Mart, which have come up with concepts or goods that have reshaped their industries.

C?According to a new book by two consultants from Arthur D. Little, during the last 15 years, the top 20% of firms in Fortune magazine’s annual innovation survey have attained twice as much the shareholder returns as their peers.The desperate search for new ideas is the stimulus for a large part of today’s merger boom. The same goes for the money spent on licensing and purchasing others’ intellectual property. Based on the statistics from Pasadena-based Patent & Licence Exchange, trade volume in intangible assets in America has gone up from $15 billion in 1990 to $100 billion in 1998, with small firms and individuals taking up an increasing share of the rewards.

D?And that terrifies big companies: it appears that innovative work is incompatible with them. Some major famous companies that are always known for ‘innovative ideas’, such as 3M, Procter & Gamble, and Rubbermaid, have recently had dry spells. Peter Chernin, who runs the Fox TV and film empire for News Corporation, points out that ‘In the management of creativity, size is your enemy.’ It’s impossible for someone who’s managing 20 movies to be as involved as someone doing 5. Therefore, he has tried to divide the studio into smaller parts, disregarding the risk of higher expenses.

E?Nowadays, ideas are more likely to prosper outside big companies. In the old days, when a brilliant scientist came up with an idea and wanted to make money out of it, he would take it to a big company first. But now, with all this cheap venture capital around, he would probably want to commercialise it by himself. So far, Umagic has already raised $5m and is on its way to another $25m. Even in the case of capital-intensive businesses like pharmaceuticals, entrepreneurs have the option to conduct early-stage research and sell out to the big firms when they’re faced with costly, risky clinical trials. Approximately 1/3 of drug firms’ total revenue is now from licensed-in technology.

F?Some of the major enterprises such as General Electric and Cisco have been impressively triumphant when it comes to snatching and incorporating small companies’ scores. However, other grants are concerned about the money they have to spend and the way to keep those geniuses who generated the idea.It is the dream of everyone to develop more ideas within their organisations. Proctor & Gamble is currently switching their entire business focus from countries to products; one of the goals is to get the whole company to accept the innovations. In other places, the craving for innovation has caused ‘a(chǎn) frenzy for entrepreneurship’, transferring power by establishing internal idea-workshops and tracking inventory so that the talent will stay.

GSome people don’t believe that this kind of restructuring is sufficient. Clayton Christensen argues in their new book that big firms’ many advantages, such as taking care of their existing customers, can get in the way of the innovative behaviour that is necessary for handling disruptive technologies. That’s why there’s been the trend of cannibalisation, which brings about businesses that will confront and jeopardise the existing ones. For example, Bank One has set up Wingspan, which is an online bank that in fact competes with its actual branches.

H?There’s no denying that innovation is a big deal. However, do major firms have to be this pessimistic? According to a recent survey of the top 50 innovations in America by Industry Week, ideas are equally likely to come from both big and small companies. Big companies can adopt new ideas when they are mature enough and the risks and rewards have become more quantifiable.

?

SECTION 3: QUESTIONS 28-40

Questions 28-33

Reading Passage 3 has nine paragraphs,?A-I.

Which paragraph contains the following information?

Write the correct letter,?A-I,?in boxes?28-33?on your answer sheet.

NB?You may use any letter more than once.

28?___________? ? an approach to retaining?the best employees

29?___________? ??increasing spending on attaining innovative ideas

30?___________? ? a certain counter-effect produced by integrating outside?firms

31?___________? ? an example of three famous innovative American companies

32?___________? ? an example of a?company changing its focus

33?___________? ? an example of a company resolving financial difficulties itself

Questions 34-37

Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 3??

In boxes?34-37?on your answer sheet, write

?

TRUE

if the statement agrees with the information

FALSE

if the statement contradicts the information

NOT GIVEN

If there is no information on this

?

34?_________________? ? Umagic is the most successful innovative company in this new field.

35?_________________? ? Amazon and Wal-Mart exchanged their innovation experience.

36?_________________? ??In the past, the originators of new ideas took them to small companies

37?_________________? ? IBM failed to understand Umagic’s proposal of a new idea.

Questions 38-40

Choose the correct letter,?A, B, C?or?D.

Write the correct letter in boxes?38-40?on your answer sheet.

?

38What is the author’s opinion on innovation in paragraph C?

AIt only works for big companies.

BFortune magazine has a globally huge influence.

CIt is becoming increasingly important.

DIts effects on American companies are more evident.

?

39What is Peter Chemin’s point of view on innovation?

ASmall companies are more innovative than big ones.

BFilm industry needs more innovation than other industries.

CWe need to cut the cost when risks occur.

DNew ideas are more likely to go to big companies.

?

40What is the author’s opinion on innovation at the end of this passage?

AUmagic’s success lies in the accidental ‘virtual expert’.

BInnovation is easy and straightforward.

CIBM sets a good example on innovation.

DThe author’s attitude is uncertain on innovation.

?